Complaints and Appeals Procedures

  1. Governing policy

The Complaints and Appeals Procedures (“procedures”) relate to the Complaints and Appeals Policy (“policy”). They describe how students and staff are to enact the policy, including the steps to be taken in managing the complaints and appeals process.

  1. Scope

These procedures are relevant to all enrolled students, prospective students and past students and any staff involved in a complaint or appeal.

  1. Procedures

3.1 These procedures set out the three key internal processes that may be used to resolve a complaint or appeal:

Informal resolution – self-managed

In the first instance, students are encouraged to seek an informal settlement of their issue at the local level, where it is reasonable and appropriate to do so, before a formal complaint or appeal is submitted.

Complaint

Where a matter cannot be informally resolved, or if a student is dissatisfied with the outcome of a decision, the student may lodge a formal complaint using the appropriate online form. Students who require support to lodge a complaint, including a different method of submission, should contact the Student Support Centre for advice.

Students are entitled to lodge a complaint about any academic or administrative matter, including (but not limited to):

  1. the conduct and performance of staff;
  2. services and facilities provided by or managed by the Institution;
  3. dealings with the Institution’s international representatives (agents), homestay providers, welfare providers or other related parties;
  4. conduct and performance of other students;
  5. review of a decision made by the Institution;
  6. failure to adhere to relevant policies and procedures.

A complaint lodged by a former student more than six months after completing their studies is not normally considered. Exceptions to this are made in exceptional circumstances only (e.g. FEE-HELP re-credit). A delay in lodging can affect the Institution’s ability to investigate the matter.

Appeal

Where a student is not satisfied with the outcome of the complaint the student may initiate a formal appeal provided there are sufficient grounds as follows:

  1. failure to provide natural justice or procedural fairness;
  2. where the decision is inconsistent with a published policy or procedures;
  3. where there are new or different grounds and/or supporting evidence to those already considered by the original decision maker;
  4. the penalty was not commensurate to the incident; and/or
  5. on other reasonable grounds, as determined on a case by case by the Chair of the Appeals Committee, beyond the above.

An Appeal Committee is only convened if the Chair of the Appeals Committee is satisfied that there are grounds for an appeal and the relevant documentary evidence submitted.

External review

Students who are not satisfied with the outcome or the management of a decision made by the Institution may make a complaint to an appropriate external agency at any time. External agencies normally only act if all the internal processes have been completed.

Table 1. Internal complaints and appeals resolution process

Process Responsibilities Timeframe
A.  Informal resolution procedures
  1. Students are encouraged to resolve their concern informally either via email or in person (between to two parties) if it is reasonable and appropriate to do so. This option is not encouraged for students with a grievance relating to sexual harm (see item 2.c).
  2. Students can also seek advice and support from Student Services, the wellness team, faculty staff or operations staff.
  3. Students seeking a review of a final grade or assessment mark of a subject must refer to the Student Review of Assessment Results Procedures in the first instance.
  4. All requests to informally resolve a concern, either in writing or in person, are addressed within five working days.
 Lecturers and faculty staff such as the Program Manager

Student Services

Wellness team

Operations staff

 

 Requests addressed within five working days
B.  Complaint procedures
 

  1. If a student is dissatisfied with the outcome of the informal resolution process, or they have opted not to seeks informal resolution, thy may lodge a complaint.
  2. Complaints must be lodged on via the online form with any supporting documentation within 20 working days of the issue occurring or upon notification of the initial decision (extensions of this timeframe may be granted in exceptional circumstances and at the discretion of the Institution). Students who require support to lodge a complaint, including a different method of submission, should contact the Student Support Centre for advice. This timeframe does not apply for students seeking to complain about sexual harm.
  3. Students seeking to make a complaint relating to sexual harm are encouraged to seek assistance from the Student Success Centre Manager who can provide confidential support, advice on the complaints process and referral to external agencies as appropriate.
  4. The completed online form (and any supporting documentation) is acknowledged and registered within two working days.
  5. Complaints are dealt with by the Dean/Associate Dean or Program Manager (IT) (as relevant) for academic matters or the Vice President (Student Life) for non-academic matters. Complaints that involve both academic and financial components are determined by the Vice President (Finance) (or delegate). If the complaint relates to the person involved in the complaint handling process it will be referred to the relevant line manager.
  6. An investigation is conducted, which may involve formal meetings/interviews where those involved in a complaint have a right to present their case. The investigating officer takes heed to past precedents and closely follows the Institution’s policies and procedures to ensure outcomes are consistent.
  7. The investigation of a complaint commences within 10 working days of receipt of the complaint and is finalised as soon as practicable. The student is notified if the investigation takes longer than 10 working days.
  8. If a complaint outcome is in the favour of the student, the Institution immediately implements the decision or recommendation and/or take the preventative or corrective action required by the decision and notify the complainant accordingly.
  9. However, if the student is dissatisfied with the outcome of a complaint they may submit an appeal provided there are sufficient grounds as outlined in these procedures.
  10. Student Services to set up work task to check progress after 20 working days. If an appeal has not been submitted then the case is closed.
  11. Student Services to record outcomes and all correspondence in Student Record Management System.
 Dean/Associate Dean or PM(IT) (as relevant) for academic matters

Vice President (Student Life) for non-academic matters

 Lodge within 20 working days

Acknowledgement within two working days.

Commence investigation within 10 working days finalise outcome as soon as practicable.
C.  Appeal procedures
  1. If a student is dissatisfied with the outcome of their complaint they may lodge an appeal provided there are sufficient grounds and additional evidence as outlined in these procedures.
  2. Appeals must be lodged on the online form within 20 working days of notification of the complaint decision (extensions of this timeframe may be granted in exceptional circumstances and at the discretion of the Chief Quality Officer). This timeframe does not apply for students seeking to complain about sexual harm or those with any other compelling and compassionate reasons.
  3. Students seeking to appeal an outcome relating to sexual harm are encouraged to seek assistance from the Student Success Centre Manager who can provide confidential support, counselling, advice on the appeals process and referral to external agencies as appropriate
  4. The completed online form and any supporting documentation is acknowledged and registered within two working days.
  5. Appeals must include the grounds for the appeal as outlined in paragraph 3.1 of these procedures and additional evidence to support the appeal application.
  6. All types of appeals are considered by the Appeals Committee, which is convened normally within 10 working days of receipt of the appeal. The student has the right to attend the committee meeting to present their case. They may be accompanied by a support person but may not have legal representation. All deliberations and outcomes are determined by the Committee in closed session. The student is notified if the investigation takes longer than 10 working days. The Appeals Committee takes heed to past precedents and closely follows the Institution’s policies and procedures in reaching a decision to ensure outcomes are consistent.
  7. The student is notified in writing of the outcome of the appeal within 10 working days of a decision being reached. The correspondence will state a student’s right to access an external review of the decision and provides full details of the external review options.
  8. If an outcome of an appeal is in the favour of the student, the Institution immediately implements the decision or recommendation and/or take the preventative or corrective action required by the decision, and notify the complainant accordingly.
  9. The outcome of the Appeals Committee is the final internal avenue of complaint and appeal resolution process. The student can access the external review as outlined in paragraph 4 of these procedures.
  10. Student Services records outcomes and all correspondence in Student Record Management System.
 Appeals Committee Lodge within 20 working days

 

Appeals Committee normally convened within 10 working days, and the outcome finalised as soon as practicable.

 

Acknowledgement within two working days.

 

Students notified of Appeals Committee decision within five working days of the Committee being convened

 

 

 

 

 
  1. External review

4.1  When students are not satisfied with the outcome of a complaint or appeal, they may seek a review with the National Student Ombudsman (NSO). The NSO works with students to resolve complaints about the actions taken by their higher education provider. Whether a domestic or international student, an undergraduate or postgraduate student, the NSO is available. The NSO is independent, impartial, and can consider how a student’s higher education provider has handled a range of issues including student safety and wellbeing, racism and racial vilification, discrimination, gender-based violence, course administration, teaching provisions and facilities, and the fairness and effectiveness of student complaints processes.

The NSO cannot consider complaints related to a vocational education and training (VET) course, complaints related to education providers who are not Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) registered, complaints related to an individuals’ employment with a higher education provider or complaints related to the appointment of a person to an office of a higher education provider. The NSO cannot consider complaints about academic decisions, such as complaints about grades. However, administrative complaints related to grades, such as complaints about the appeals process, may be considered by the NSO.

If a student is dissatisfied with the way the Institution has handled a complaint, they can talk to the NSO. The NSO can consider whether the decisions or actions of the Institution were unreasonable or unfair and make recommendations to improve the student experience. The NSO offers a restorative engagement process, where appropriate, as well as alternative dispute resolution processes including mediation.

The NSO is a free and confidential service for all students, and a student can make their complaint in a way that is safe for them. The NSO will work with a student to consider the best resolution pathway, and if their services are not right for their situation, they can refer them to a service that’s more appropriate. Visit nso.gov.au to find out more.

  1. Student conduct

5.1 Students must make complaints and appeals responsibly and must not seek to raise an issue for trivial or vexatious reasons. The Institution does not tolerate unreasonable behaviour, exaggeration or dishonesty, unreasonable persistence after an investigation has closed, or unrealistic or disproportionate demands. Students are expected to provide serious reasons and factual evidence in support of a complaint or an appeal or request for review. Vexatious complainants are dealt with in accordance with the General Misconduct Policy and General Misconduct Procedures.

  1. Compliance and monitoring

6.1 In accordance with TEQSA Standard 2.4, the approach to complaint and appeal handling is intended to be timely, free of cost, consistent, fair, without reprisal and handled confidentially and all subsequent actions are intended to be achieved in good time. Also, in accordance with TEQSA Standard 7.2, information about grievance handling is easily accessible to students as is information about advocacy and external sources for further appeals.

6.2 Additionally, reports on complaints and appeals are provided to relevant departments and committees to ensure that the Institution acts systemically on frequent sources of complaint for students. Complaints are used to identify and address any issues in the Institution’s policies, procedures and operations.

  1. Reporting

7.1 The Executive Management Group (EMG) monitors non-academic complaints and appeals and refers matters for improvement to departments. It may also make amendments to the Complaints and Appeals Procedures as required.

7.2 The Learning and Teaching Committee monitors academic related complaints and appeals and reports to Academic Board with recommendations for improvement as required.

7.3 An annual summary report is submitted to the Board of Directors by the President for consideration of possible actions to address underlying causes of all student complaints (both non-academic and academic).

  1. Records management

8.1 A record of all complaints, notes on actions, notes of appeals committees and outcomes of complaints and appeals is maintained on Student Record Management System by the Vice President (Student Life).

See Appendix 1 Complaints and Appeals Flowchart

  1. Related documents
  • Academic Integrity Policy
  • Academic Integrity Procedures
  • Artificial Intelligence Policy
  • Assessment Policy
  • Assessment Procedures
  • Complaints and Appeals Policy
  • General Misconduct Policy
  • General Misconduct Procedures
  • Sexual Harm Policy
  • Sexual Harm Procedures
  • Student Code of Conduct
  • Student Review of Assessment Results Procedures

Approved by EMG on 20 February 2025